On 20090120.2203+0100, Andy Johnson <ajohnson@aecno.com> wrote:
The glibc.sh script doesn't handle the glibc versions with
an underscore very well (bash expected integer error). I
have attached a small patch for that. Instead of looking
for "not period" I changed the sense to look for numbers.
I initially tried to make it look for either a period or
an underscore, but that didn't work like I wanted (probably
because I did something wrong).

Original patch modified to be more robust.

/trunk/scripts/build/libc/glibc.sh | 8 4 4 0 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Original patch from Gentoo:

gentoo/src/patchsets/binutils/2.19/76_all_use-new-ld-dtags.patch

diff -durN binutils-2.19.orig/ld/ldmain.c binutils-2.19/ld/ldmain.c

--- binutils-2.19.orig/ld/ldmain.c	2008-11-23 16:54:42.000000000 +0100

+++ binutils-2.19/ld/ldmain.c	2008-11-23 16:56:16.000000000 +0100

@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@

   link_info.allow_undefined_version = TRUE;

   link_info.keep_memory = TRUE;

+  link_info.new_dtags = TRUE;

   link_info.combreloc = TRUE;

   link_info.strip_discarded = TRUE;

   link_info.emit_hash = TRUE;