patches/binutils/2.22/400-fix_arm_gc_sections.patch
| author |
Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com> |
|
Mon Nov 19 21:45:09 2012 +0100 (2012-11-19) |
| changeset 3121 |
5016315d88ba |
| permissions |
-rw-r--r-- |
binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies
In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.
So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.
Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971
|
f@3051
|
1 |
--- a/bfd/elf32-arm.c
|
|
f@3051
|
2 |
+++ b/bfd/elf32-arm.c
|
|
f@3051
|
3 |
@@ -12408,7 +12408,8 @@ elf32_arm_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struc
|
|
f@3051
|
4 |
|
|
f@3051
|
5 |
/* If the symbol is a function that doesn't bind locally,
|
|
f@3051
|
6 |
this relocation will need a PLT entry. */
|
|
f@3051
|
7 |
- root_plt->refcount += 1;
|
|
f@3051
|
8 |
+ if (root_plt->refcount != -1)
|
|
f@3051
|
9 |
+ root_plt->refcount += 1;
|
|
f@3051
|
10 |
|
|
f@3051
|
11 |
if (!call_reloc_p)
|
|
f@3051
|
12 |
arm_plt->noncall_refcount++;
|