binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies

In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.

So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.

Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971

diff -durN duma_2_5_14.orig/Makefile duma_2_5_14/Makefile

--- duma_2_5_14.orig/Makefile	2008-06-17 10:30:40.000000000 +0200

+++ duma_2_5_14/Makefile	2008-06-17 10:30:17.000000000 +0200

@@ -228,9 +228,13 @@

 	dumatest.c tstheap.c thread-test.c testmt.c dumatestpp.cpp testoperators.cpp \

 	createconf.c

-OBJECTS = dumapp.o duma.o sem_inc.o print.o

+OBJECTS = duma.o sem_inc.o print.o

+SO_OBJECTS = duma_so.o sem_inc_so.o print_so.o

-SO_OBJECTS = dumapp_so.o duma_so.o sem_inc_so.o print_so.o

+ifeq ($(DUMA_CPP),1)

+OBJECTS += dumapp.o

+SO_OBJECTS += dumapp_so.o

+endif

 all:	libduma.a tstheap$(EXEPOSTFIX) dumatest$(EXEPOSTFIX) thread-test$(EXEPOSTFIX) testmt$(EXEPOSTFIX) dumatestpp$(EXEPOSTFIX) testoperators$(EXEPOSTFIX) $(DUMA_DYN_DEPS)