1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/patches/binutils/2.14/binutils-sh-relocs.patch Sat May 19 13:10:11 2007 +0000
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
1.4 +Message-Id: <200307311239.h6VCdNe27056@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.5 +To: dank@kegel.com
1.6 +Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
1.7 +Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4? (was: Re: "make tests" fails
1.8 + with "libc.so: text relocations used" in glibc-2.3.2 for sh4)
1.9 +In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:55:54 -0700"
1.10 + <3F28A15A.5010400@kegel.com>
1.11 +References: <3F28A15A.5010400@kegel.com>
1.12 +Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:47:38 +0900
1.13 +From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.14 +
1.15 +Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
1.16 +>> I'll give binutils-2.14.90.0.5 a shot, then.
1.17 +>
1.18 +> No joy - same problem. Guess I'll take this up on binutils and/or libc-alpha.
1.19 +
1.20 +Please try the patch below, though it's a diff against the current
1.21 +binutils CVS.
1.22 +
1.23 +Regards,
1.24 + kaz
1.25 +--
1.26 +diff -u3p ORIG/src/bfd/elf32-sh.c LOCAL/src/bfd/elf32-sh.c
1.27 +--- src/bfd/elf32-sh.c.old Fri Jul 25 14:46:58 2003
1.28 ++++ src/bfd/elf32-sh.c Thu Jul 31 21:09:38 2003
1.29 +@@ -6497,8 +6497,10 @@ sh_elf_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct b
1.30 + sreloc, 2))
1.31 + return FALSE;
1.32 + }
1.33 ++#if 0
1.34 + if (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY)
1.35 + info->flags |= DF_TEXTREL;
1.36 ++#endif
1.37 + elf_section_data (sec)->sreloc = sreloc;
1.38 + }
1.39 +
1.40 +
1.41 +