1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/patches/gcc/2.95.3/deque-leak-fix.patch Sat Jun 16 18:01:59 2007 +0000
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1.4 +[See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00133.html ]
1.5 +
1.6 +Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:06:22 -0500
1.7 +From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
1.8 +To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
1.9 +Subject: [libstdc++ trunk & 3.0] Fix deque memory leak
1.10 +Message-ID: <20011116160622.A23094@disaster.jaj.com>
1.11 +
1.12 +
1.13 +As discussed on the libstdc++ mailing list. Tested on i686/linux.
1.14 +
1.15 +
1.16 +
1.17 +2001-11-16 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
1.18 +
1.19 + * include/bits/stl_deque.h (deque::erase()): Fix memory leak.
1.20 +
1.21 +
1.22 +[rediffed against 2.95.3 -- dank]
1.23 +
1.24 +--- gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h.old 2001-01-01 09:48:22.000000000 -0800
1.25 ++++ gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h 2006-02-18 15:24:17.000000000 -0800
1.26 +@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@
1.27 + copy_backward(_M_start, __first, __last);
1.28 + iterator __new_start = _M_start + __n;
1.29 + destroy(_M_start, __new_start);
1.30 +- _M_destroy_nodes(__new_start._M_node, _M_start._M_node);
1.31 ++ _M_destroy_nodes(_M_start._M_node, __new_start._M_node); /* fixed per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00139.html */
1.32 + _M_start = __new_start;
1.33 + }
1.34 + else {