1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/patches/gcc/3.3/sh-spec.patch Tue May 22 21:16:17 2007 +0000
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
1.4 +Message-Id: <200308020452.h724q0n01509@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.5 +To: dank@kegel.com
1.6 +Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
1.7 +Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4?
1.8 +In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:15:27 -0700"
1.9 + <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
1.10 +References: <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
1.11 +Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:58:05 +0900
1.12 +From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.13 +
1.14 +Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
1.15 +> It seems it might be from gcc's spec file:
1.16 +>
1.17 +> *subtarget_link_spec:
1.18 +> %{shared:-shared} %{!static: %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} %{static:-static}
1.19 +>
1.20 +> as the only place -rpath showed up was in the output of gcc -v as it
1.21 +> was linking libc.so.
1.22 +>
1.23 +> Well, that's a clue, anyway! Guess I'll dig through the spec files
1.24 +> tomorrow to see if I can figure it out some more.
1.25 +
1.26 +I've grepped gcc/config/*/*.h and found only SH and old libc1 stuffs
1.27 +of i386/alpha include %{!rpath:-rpath ... in 3.3 release and the
1.28 +current CVS. And my sh-gcc's specs doesn't have this :-(
1.29 +It would be the Right Thing to remove this stuff simply. How about
1.30 +the gcc patch below?
1.31 +
1.32 +Regards,
1.33 + kaz
1.34 +--
1.35 +--- gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig Sat Aug 2 13:20:57 2003
1.36 ++++ gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h Sat Aug 2 13:22:42 2003
1.37 +@@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ do { \
1.38 + "%{shared:-shared} \
1.39 + %{!static: \
1.40 + %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \
1.41 +- %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} \
1.42 +- %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} \
1.43 ++ %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2}} \
1.44 + %{static:-static}"
1.45 +
1.46 + /* The GNU C++ standard library requires that these macros be defined. */
1.47 +
1.48 +