Original patch from Gentoo:

 gentoo/src/patchsets/binutils/2.19/66_all_binutils-2.18.50.0.2-warn-textrel.patch

 textrels are bad for forcing copy-on-write (this affects everyone),

 and for security/runtime code generation, this affects security ppl.

 But in either case, it doesn't matter who needs textrels, it's

 the very fact that they're needed at all.

 diff -durN binutils-2.19.orig/bfd/elflink.c binutils-2.19/bfd/elflink.c

 --- binutils-2.19.orig/bfd/elflink.c	2008-11-23 16:49:47.000000000 +0100

 +++ binutils-2.19/bfd/elflink.c	2008-11-23 16:49:14.000000000 +0100

 @@ -10820,14 +10820,12 @@

  	goto error_return;

        /* Check for DT_TEXTREL (late, in case the backend removes it).  */

 -      if (info->warn_shared_textrel && info->shared)

 +      o = bfd_get_section_by_name (dynobj, ".dynamic");

 +      if (info->warn_shared_textrel && o != NULL)

  	{

  	  bfd_byte *dyncon, *dynconend;

  	  /* Fix up .dynamic entries.  */

 -	  o = bfd_get_section_by_name (dynobj, ".dynamic");

 -	  BFD_ASSERT (o != NULL);

 -

  	  dyncon = o->contents;

  	  dynconend = o->contents + o->size;

  	  for (; dyncon < dynconend; dyncon += bed->s->sizeof_dyn)

 @@ -10839,7 +10837,7 @@

  	      if (dyn.d_tag == DT_TEXTREL)

  		{

  		 info->callbacks->einfo

 -		    (_("%P: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared object.\n"));

 +		    (_("%P: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object.\n"));

  		  break;

  		}

  	    }

 diff -durN binutils-2.19.orig/ld/ldmain.c binutils-2.19/ld/ldmain.c

 --- binutils-2.19.orig/ld/ldmain.c	2008-08-17 05:12:50.000000000 +0200

 +++ binutils-2.19/ld/ldmain.c	2008-11-23 16:52:37.000000000 +0100

 @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@

    link_info.relax_pass = 1;

    link_info.pei386_auto_import = -1;

    link_info.spare_dynamic_tags = 5;

 +  link_info.warn_shared_textrel = TRUE;

    link_info.path_separator = ':';

    ldfile_add_arch ("");