patches/binutils/2.17/170-bfd-hash-tweak.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Sun Mar 08 11:14:03 2009 +0000 (2009-03-08)
changeset 1243 5d15872659ec
parent 56 07a6a48962b7
permissions -rw-r--r--
Add binutils-2.19.1 patchset, propagated from the 2.19 patchset.

/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/120-sh-targets.patch | 57 57 0 0 +++
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/170-use-relro.patch | 19 19 0 0 +
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/160-use-new-ld-dtags.patch | 19 19 0 0 +
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/180-libiberty-pic.patch | 19 19 0 0 +
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/100-ppc64-pie.patch | 25 25 0 0 +
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/110-RPATH_ENVVAR-smack.patch | 22 22 0 0 +
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/140-pt-pax-flags-20081101.patch | 254 254 0 0 +++++++++++++++
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/150-warn-textrel.patch | 53 53 0 0 +++
/trunk/patches/binutils/2.19.1/130-check_ldrunpath_length.patch | 36 36 0 0 ++
9 files changed, 504 insertions(+)
     1 Signed-off-by: dank@kegel.com
     2 
     3 Raising the size of the hash table is a noticable win when linking 
     4 at least one large app.  
     5 
     6 There was a patch,
     7 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-06/msg00165.html
     8 to do this dynamically.  No idea why that didn't make it in.
     9 So this tiny change to raise the default size is just
    10 a stopgap for now.
    11 
    12 
    13 --- binutils-2.17/bfd/hash.c.old	2006-03-02 23:01:39.000000000 -0800
    14 +++ binutils-2.17/bfd/hash.c	2006-03-02 23:01:58.000000000 -0800
    15 @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
    16  */
    17  
    18  /* The default number of entries to use when creating a hash table.  */
    19 -#define DEFAULT_SIZE 4051
    20 +#define DEFAULT_SIZE 32749
    21  static size_t bfd_default_hash_table_size = DEFAULT_SIZE;
    22  
    23  /* Create a new hash table, given a number of entries.  */