Revert revision 201: renaming the two cc_core passes was a bad idea.
1 --- /dev/null Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
2 +++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr11864-1.c Sun Sep 14 14:32:24 2003
4 +/* PR optimization/11864
5 + * Reporter: Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>
6 + * Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompiles zero extension and test
8 + * gcc-3.3/3.4 -O2 for sh target may miscompile the combination of zero extension
9 + * and test if it's zero.
11 + * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com. Not marked as xfail because it's a regression.
14 +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
16 +extern void abort(void);
35 + a[0] = 1 + (f() & 127);
38 +int main(int argc, char **argv)