Bart De VOS pointed out that removing absolute paths from the libc linker scripts is plainly wrong.
It dates from dawn ages of the original crosstool code, and is not well explained. At that time, binutils might not understand the sysroot stuff, and it was necessary to remove absolute paths in that case.
/trunk/scripts/build/libc/glibc.sh | 14 2 12 0 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
1 [See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00133.html ]
3 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:06:22 -0500
4 From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
5 To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 Subject: [libstdc++ trunk & 3.0] Fix deque memory leak
7 Message-ID: <20011116160622.A23094@disaster.jaj.com>
10 As discussed on the libstdc++ mailing list. Tested on i686/linux.
14 2001-11-16 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
16 * include/bits/stl_deque.h (deque::erase()): Fix memory leak.
19 [rediffed against 2.95.3 -- dank]
21 --- gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h.old 2001-01-01 09:48:22.000000000 -0800
22 +++ gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h 2006-02-18 15:24:17.000000000 -0800
24 copy_backward(_M_start, __first, __last);
25 iterator __new_start = _M_start + __n;
26 destroy(_M_start, __new_start);
27 - _M_destroy_nodes(__new_start._M_node, _M_start._M_node);
28 + _M_destroy_nodes(_M_start._M_node, __new_start._M_node); /* fixed per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00139.html */
29 _M_start = __new_start;