patches/gcc/4.2.1/190-c99-complex-ugly-hack.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tue Sep 23 14:48:10 2008 +0000 (2008-09-23)
changeset 872 fd4bf138f08f
parent 313 2f223aafc7cb
permissions -rw-r--r--
Bart De VOS pointed out that removing absolute paths from the libc linker scripts is plainly wrong.
It dates from dawn ages of the original crosstool code, and is not well explained. At that time, binutils might not understand the sysroot stuff, and it was necessary to remove absolute paths in that case.

/trunk/scripts/build/libc/glibc.sh | 14 2 12 0 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
     1 diff -durN gcc-4.2.1.orig/libstdc++-v3/configure gcc-4.2.1/libstdc++-v3/configure
     2 --- gcc-4.2.1.orig/libstdc++-v3/configure	2007-08-03 20:30:21.000000000 +0200
     3 +++ gcc-4.2.1/libstdc++-v3/configure	2007-08-03 20:33:56.000000000 +0200
     4 @@ -7514,6 +7514,9 @@
     5  cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
     6  /* end confdefs.h.  */
     7  #include <complex.h>
     8 +#ifdef __UCLIBC__
     9 +#error ugly hack to make sure configure test fails here for cross until uClibc supports the complex funcs
    10 +#endif
    11  int
    12  main ()
    13  {